Wednesday, November 20, 2019

‘India have become very stupid and very hysterical nation’ Rajiv Tyagi

Featured

Hong Kong: Students movement threatens the next escalation

Possibly it was due to the mediators that worse could be prevented in Hong Kong. The deputies, lawyers and...

Trump said: Sondland is great American now President’s famous ‘U-turn’

President Donald Trump has a history of distancing himself from associates who have found themselves in legal trouble or...

Babri mosque: Indian Supreme Court ruled in favor of Hindus in a dispute over a religious position with Muslims

India's Supreme Court on Saturday ruled in favor of a Hindu group in a long-running legal battle over a...
Zubair Yaqoob
Zubair Yaqoob
The author has diversified experience in investigative journalism. He is Chief content editor at wnobserver.com He can be reached at: [email protected]
An open letter of retired Indian IAF fighter Pilot on Whatsapp

This morning as I woke up at 5AM in Gurugram, I was informed of an IAF strike on Balakot, in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunwa area, approximately 200 km North West of India’s nearest Air Force station at Avantipur, South East of Srinagar. A few phone calls later, I learned it was a pre-dawn attack at 0330 hrs, which delivered 1,000 kg bombs to a designated target area. Since then, I have been holding my horses, waiting for and actually watching a whole nation descend into hysterical paroxysms of joy and celebration, as if we have removed Pakistan from existence!

Hopefully the paroxysms are over by now. The hysterics will take a little more time to calm down. But it is now time, to analyze this action in the light of cold, sober logic after 16 hours of pointless celebration.

In this case as in many before, the Govt of India has asked the Armed forces to act on its behalf and the Armed Forces have delivered, only to once again be used for the personal glorification of Narendra Modi.

 

once again be used for the personal glorification of Narendra Modi

 

Also, once again, we have used conventional forces to strike at extremely low-value tactical targets of an adversary that uses asymmetric warfare against us. In hindsight we can see once again, the Govt has used the Armed Forces in an ill-advised action, purely for propaganda purposes, without achieving any strategic or tactical goal, except maybe the minimally valid goal of delivering a military message to a recalcitrant adversary.

To understand what our Govt has asked the Air Force to do, it is important to first understand the technology used by fighter aircraft to acquire and destroy targets and how weapons are chosen… To carry a particular weapon load, first the nature of the target needs to be known – is it a soft skin target, like trucks and jeeps?

In which case 30 mm front guns or rockets can be used, even rockets being overkill, 30 mm armor piercing incendiary (API) cannon rounds being sufficient to completely destroy soft skinned targets. If armor is known to be present in the target area, 58 mm API rockets, released in a barrage of 8, 16 or 32 rockets per barrage, would be the choice, depending on the nature of the armor.

If the target is an area, not point-targets like soft skinned vehicles or buildings but troop concentrations or buildings over a large area, bombs would be the choice.

There is also the choice of guided weapons, which may either be guided by reflected modulated laser or guided by an image processing or radio guidance system, depending on whether we are targeting a designated or target of opportunity or a radio transmitter like a wireless or a radar station.

The choice of weapon is also guided by the cost of the asset versus the target. For example, one can ill afford to target a tin shed or a tent, with TV-guided munitions. But then, neither should we be targeting a tin shed with a fighter aircraft, unless the tin shed is known to house a tactical or strategic target of sufficient importance to use such platforms or munitions. Cost here, is not just the acquisition cost, but a matrix of the replacement cost and the cost of availability when you actually need such munitions for their specific features.

The Balakot Mirage-2000 raid delivered 1,000 kg bombs, obviously at pre-decided coordinate(s). It is clear that we did not have a point target in mind. We wanted to deliver area munitions in the general area of a pre-decided coordinate – a perfectly valid decision, if we are to deliver a military warning to a recalcitrant adversary.

Where did TV channels get the number of casualties from, or that a terrorist camp had been destroyed? Even the IAF would not have been able to acquire that information after a raid at 0330 hrs. Obviously, agents of the GoI are feeding this fake info to TV channels and the print medium.

Indian TV channels have been baying for blood and revenge since Feb 14 and given the raised temperatures, the PAF would already be on standby to mount combat air patrol or interception at very short notice. After all, we wanted the publicity of having mounted a response to Pulwama, without the consequences of war or the embarrassment of losing assets.

More than any other discussion, we need to ask, why did the Govt of India once again, use a military operation for publicity? Consider the consequences now – we have violated an international border to deliver munitions at a target inside Pakistan and instead of keeping it a secret, we have publicized it so much, with every minion of the Govt saying something or the other on the subject, that we have denied ourselves all plausible deniability! Pakistan will now go to the UN and say India attacked it without provocation. And we cannot even deny the attack! Stupid! We are now aggressors, instead of defenders.

 

We have become a very stupid and a very hysterical nation, almost akin to caricatures out of a cartoon movie. And we vote for politicians exactly like us

 

In a different dimension, we have frittered away the traditional Russian UNSC veto, which has been exercised in our favour innumerable times in the past, have invited the Chinese veto against us and not at all gained the US veto to our side. The US geopolitical interest still lies in Pakistan, not in India, because Afghanistan-Pakistan is still a US geopolitical engagement, with a Shia nuclear-capable Iran to the West of this region and Pakistan closely allied to another US geopolitical interest, Saudi Arabia.

So now if the UNSC resolves any action against India, which UNSC veto-power will we turn to, to exercise its veto in our favour, to preclude such action?

I don’t know what has happened to our populace. We have become a very stupid and a very hysterical nation, almost akin to caricatures out of a cartoon movie. And we vote for politicians exactly like us.

 

Zubair Yaqoob
Zubair Yaqoob
The author has diversified experience in investigative journalism. He is Chief content editor at wnobserver.com He can be reached at: [email protected]

Latest News

Hong Kong: Students movement threatens the next escalation

Possibly it was due to the mediators that worse could be prevented in Hong Kong. The deputies, lawyers and...

US marine demands $ 20 million compensation for his imprisonment in Iran for espionage

A former US Marine is demanding $20 million from the Terrorism Victims Fund. Amir Mirza Hekmati, who holds US and Iranian citizenship, was jailed...

US welcomes the release of two American and Australian hostages from Afghanistan

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said his country welcomes the release of hostages including US professor Kevin King and Australian professor Timothy Weeks,...

Mark Esper: We are committed to support Philippines to deter terrorist threats

Washington is committed to supporting the Philippines to deter terrorist threats in the region, US Defense Secretary Mark Esper said at a joint press...

British election campaign overshadowed by a sex scandal cloud on Prince Andrew

Britain's election campaign was overshadowed by a cloud of Prince Andrew alleged sex scandal on Monday as Queen Elizabeth's second son faced a backlash...
- Advertisement -

Related News