Saturday, September 21, 2019
No menu items!
  • Europe

British PM criticized with letter to EU backstop regulation


Shinzo Abe reshuffles Japanese Cabinet, Shinjiro Koizumi appointed as environment minister

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe appoints foreign ministers and new defense ministers, in addition to elevating rising political figures,...

Saudi Arabia wants uranium enrichment for its nuclear program

Saudi Arabia wants uranium enrichment for its nuclear program, the energy minister said on Monday, adding that it may...

Trump’s decision has left Afghanistan on the verge of bloody lead in National elections

US President Donald Trump's decision to cancel talks with the Taliban, at least for the time being, has left...
Zubair Yaqoob
Zubair Yaqoob
The author has diversified experience in business reporting. He is Chief content editor at He can be reached at: [email protected]

The British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, in a letter to EU Council President Donald Tusk, he has again attempted to abolish the backstop regulation on the Irish border in the Brexit agreement. Johnson made it clear that the United Kingdom would leave the EU on 31 October. “I sincerely hope that we will exit with an agreement”, Johnson wrote.

This is the “highest priority” of his government, it says at the beginning of the four-page letter to Tusk, which was also transmitted by the Prime Minister to the Heads of State and Government of the other 27 EU countries and EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker. Tusk’s and the European Commission’s early reactions to Johnson’s push were cautious or critical.

Johnson once again made it clear in the letter that the backstop – an emergency regime preventing checks at the border between the United Kingdom’s Northern Ireland and the EU Member Ireland after leaving – was unacceptable to London.

Johnson offers Tusk in his letter, as a substitute for the backstop called “anti-democratic”, that both sides legally agree not to set up border controls between Northern Ireland and Ireland. Johnson writes of a transition period with “alternative agreements” that should make controls superfluous.

Apparently, this is intended in particular to an electronic detection of trade flows. There have been reflections on this for a long time, but concrete solutions are not yet in sight.

Not least because of this, in the event that until the expiry of the transitional period, which is currently planned until the end of 2020, no “alternative agreements” come into being, the head of state offers something that at first sight may seem like a concession: “We are willing to look constructively and flexibly on what commitments, of course in line with the principles set out in this letter, could be helpful”.

Tusk, the main addressee of the letter, responded coolly and dismissively to Johnson’s advance. On Twitter the EU Council President reiterated that the backstop was designed as insurance until another solution was found. Indirectly, he accused Johnson of working to reintroduce internal border controls. “Those who reject the backstop and suggest no realistic alternatives actually support the reintroduction of a border”, Tusk tweeted.

The letter to Tusk states that the backstop arrangement is “anti-democratic and inconsistent with the sovereignty of the United Kingdom as a state”, Johnson wrote. The backstop ties the kingdom potentially to an international treaty forever, binding it to the EU Customs Union. There is no way for the British to get out of it.

Johnson said the backstop itself may jeopardize peace by weakening the “delicate balance” created by the “Good Friday Agreement” to settle the civil war in Northern Ireland.

A spokeswoman for the Commission, on whose behalf EU chief negotiators Michel Barnier So far, the Brexit talks with London are ongoing, said Tuesday, the commission shares Tusk’s Twitter-based assessment.

Johnson’s letter did not contain a viable legal solution to avoid a “hard” inner-Irish border, even though this was the stated common goal of the 27 EU partners and London. Rather, Johnson acknowledges in his letter that there are no guarantees for “alternative agreements” before the end of the transitional period initially planned until the end of 2020 after the British exit from the EU.

The spokeswoman protested against London’s efforts to push the black Peter for a “hard Brexit” the EU partners. “An orderly exit is in the best interest of both the EU and the UK. And we want to continue working on that”, said the spokeswoman.

Read also: EU will not re-negotiate Brexit with Britain

Latest News

IMF Staff Concludes Visit to Pakistan

An International Monetary Fund (IMF) mission, led by Ernesto Ramirez Rigo, visited Islamabad and Karachi during September 16–20, 2019...

Whistleblower incriminates the US president

US President Donald Trump comes under pressure for alleged statements in a telephone conversation with a foreign leader. Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence...

Washington shooting: One person killed and 5 wounded in indiscriminate firing

One person was killed and five others were injured by indiscriminate gunfire in the US capital of Washington. REBREAKING¶¶ Gunfire shots heard on the streets of...

Artificial Intelligence can predict El Nino 18 months in advance

Artificial Intelligence achieves feats that we often thought were impossible to achieve. Their ability to analyze data, find patterns, and learn from them is extraordinary. One...

Belgian F-16 crashed near french base, pilot miraculously unhurt despite being trapped in high voltage line

A Belgian F-16 fighter jet has crashed in the city of Morbihan in France, pilot miraculously remain unhurt despite being trapped in high voltage...

Related News